Gas pipe, anyone?
Posted: August 24, 2008 Filed under: Media | Tags: Chris Matthews, Joe Biden, Media, obama Leave a commentHow can I take a media seriously that refers to the process of choosing a vice presidential candidate as “the veepstakes?”
Chris Matthews made me throw up in my mouth Friday night when he opened his show by asking if a certain senator was “Biden his time.” Ugh. That’s professional writing right there, huh?
Then this morning I wake up to the New York Post headline: Joebama.
Enough already.

Vanity? Fair?
Posted: April 28, 2008 Filed under: Media, TV | Tags: Detroit, high school dropouts, Miley Cyrus, unemployment Leave a commentManfrengensen read me two staggering statistics this weekend from the Wall Street Journal. In Detroit, the unemployment rate is 15%. Fifteen percent! And
that says nothing of the number of people who are underemployed. In addition to that, the high school graduation rate in Detroit is 25%. That means that 75 of every 100 children are getting left behind by the system.
I was kind of drunk on Saturday night, which is rare for me. All day Sunday, I had trouble focusing, a little headache, a lot of haze. My glasses seemed not to be working quite right. I finally sat down in the evening to watch a little TV and I realized: I hadn’t taken out my contacts when I went to bed after the party. Duh.
Speaking of high school dropouts, I don’t want to make it a habit to comment on this kind of stuff, but…
Poor Miley. Poor thing. Seriously, she’s fifteen, and she’s getting exploited from every angle. I certainly hope it all works out for this kid, but I wouldn’t be surprised if she goes all Britney in a few years.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20195785,00.html
Though I must admit that the cynical side of me thinks it’s all just crap. It’s all just PR and the sales machine. They all knew what they were doing at this photo shoot. It’s an orchestration. Oh, my god, there’s controversy in the fan base, so let’s issue a retraction (she thought the photos would be artsy, she’s just a pawn for those dirty-thinking artist-types) to placate them. The masses who want scintillation are appeased, but so are those who want their white bread nice and plain. She’s ashamed and saddened, but she can’t stop Vanity Fair from running the photos. Sure. Right.
Is there even really controversy over the photos? Or is it merely a manufactured controversy?
Any distraction will do to keep our minds off the situations in Detroit and other hard-to-face places, I guess.
This weekend, I was telling J to put his used batteries into a bag that I drop off at the recycling place. Manfrengensen likes to tease me about being an avid recycler. Not that he disagrees, but he is 2/3 Eddie Haskell, so he teases me, because like many things, I take it very seriously. This weekend he referred to me as “Alice Gore.” Thank God I have this man to keep me laughing.
Don’t Believe The Hype
Posted: April 21, 2008 Filed under: Media, Politics, TV | Tags: Bush Administration, CNN, Iraq War, Media, military, New York Times, News Leave a commentYesterday’s New York Times ran an article about how the media has been using analysts with ties to military contractors to comment on the war for the last seven years. The result has been effective in skewing the media’s coverage of the War on Terror, and specifically the Iraq War in the administration’s favor.
This is why punditry is not news, and the American news corporations do a great disservice to the people by using pundits to fill their hours. If you really want news in the United States, the closest thing you can get is NPR or the BBC (which I think CNN should look to as its model instead of FOX.)
Some highlights from the Times (underlining and bold is my emphasis):
“Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.
“The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air.
“Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to the viewers, and sometimes not even to the networks themselves. But collectively, the men on the plane and several dozen other military analysts represent more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants. The companies include defense heavyweights, but also scores of smaller companies, all part of a vast assemblage of contractors scrambling for hundreds of billions in military business generated by the administration’s war on terror. It is a furious competition, one in which inside information and easy access to senior officials are highly prized.
“Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.”
You can read the whole article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?ref=arts
Keep your vomit bag handy.
You can’t see me now, but I have to tell you that reading this article really affected my nerves. I can feel outrage running through my veins, and I sincerely hope you do too. It’s saddens me that more people in this country want to talk about last night’s results of American Idol than they do what’s going on with the war.
If you ask me, not that anyone will, this entire administration should go straight from office to Attica.


