Gas pipe, anyone?

How can I take a media seriously that refers to the process of choosing a vice presidential candidate as “the veepstakes?”

Chris Matthews made me throw up in my mouth Friday night when he opened his show by asking if a certain senator was “Biden his time.”  Ugh.  That’s professional writing right there, huh?

Then this morning I wake up to the New York Post headline: Joebama.

Enough already.


She looks like a character from HellboyEe has started asking “Why?” I love that phase. In this photo, I think she reminds me a bit of the amphibious character, Abe Sapien, from Hellboy. Those glasses are on upside down, by the way.

Wednesday, we went to lunch at a diner not far from our house because we had painters working in our kitchen. We were there for a few minutes when an older couple slid into the booth behind us. They must have been regulars, because when the waitress sidled up they exchanged friendly greetings, and the talk soon turned to the previous day’s primary in Pennsylvania.

Not that I was eavesdropping. I was sitting in our booth, trying to keep my monkeys in their seats. obama But every so often, a snippet of their conversation reached my ears, and I was subsequently appalled. The old man said, “I don’t like that Obama…” and the kids had my attention for a second, “They say he’s…” T3, would you sit down and eat your grilled cheese? and then finally: “His name is just one letter off from Osama…” and I was like, huh?... “and those connections really scare me.”

Which connections was he talking about? Were they the ones Obama made at Columbia University or Harvard Law School? How about the ones he made while he was teaching at The University of Chicago Law School, or the connections he made serving in the U.S. Senate? Do those connections mean anything to this guy?

I’ll tell you what scares me: it’s how ignorant of the facts some people can be. How can people go through life so blindly? Again, I have to blame the media, specifically TV, since most people don’t even read any more. It is the TV news networks who are to blame for the sad state of American democracy. It is they who have perpetuated the disinformation and innuendo put forth by Obama’s opponents. It is they who continue to broadcast anything said by anyone without bothering to check for facts. And it’s a shame that some people in our country are too lazy or distracted by the day-to-day to find out the real facts about Barack Obama the Man or Barack Obama the Leader.

I’m not saying you have to vote for Obama, but I do think that if you decide not to vote for him, you should base that decision on the facts, not some slanderous allegation or sleezy “slip of the tongue” made by John Ashcroft, Mitt Romney, or Wolf Blitzer.

The moment has really stuck with me. Sometimes, I think I’m too cynical, but other times, I think, no, I’m right.

I know Orwell was right. He was just off by 20 years:

War Is Peace Freedom is Slavery Ignorance is Strength

It’s time for change.


Update on Banana Bread: Serious doorstop material. Yesterday T3 began to ask for a piece, and then thought the better of it, “Mom, can I please have a piece of ba– um, some other kind of snack?”

Don’t Believe The Hype

Yesterday’s New York Times ran an article about how the media has been using analysts with ties to military contractors to comment on the war for the last seven years.  The result has been effective in skewing the media’s coverage of the War on Terror, and specifically the Iraq War in the administration’s favor.

This is why punditry is not news, and the American news corporations do a great disservice to the people by using pundits to fill their hours.  If you really want news in the United States, the closest thing you can get is NPR or the BBC (which I think CNN should look to as its model instead of FOX.)


Some highlights from the Times (underlining and bold is my emphasis):


“Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.

“The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air.

“Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to the viewers, and sometimes not even to the networks themselves. But collectively, the men on the plane and several dozen other military analysts represent more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants. The companies include defense heavyweights, but also scores of smaller companies, all part of a vast assemblage of contractors scrambling for hundreds of billions in military business generated by the administration’s war on terror. It is a furious competition, one in which inside information and easy access to senior officials are highly prized.

“Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.”


You can read the whole article at:


Keep your vomit bag handy.


You can’t see me now, but I have to tell you that reading this article really affected my nerves.  I can feel outrage running through my veins, and I sincerely hope you do too.  It’s saddens me that more people in this country want to talk about last night’s results of American Idol than they do what’s going on with the war.

If you ask me, not that anyone will, this entire administration should go straight from office to Attica.