Palin’ in Comparison
Posted: September 4, 2008 Filed under: Politics | Tags: Republican convention, Sarah Palin 3 CommentsCan I just tell you that I barely slept last night? That speech really upset me. It was the most hateful thing I have ever heard. Obama is right — the Republicans (and let’s face it, that’s who wrote the speech, the party, not Palin herself) are so focused on image and “the culture war” because they have no new ideas for the economy, the war, or the world at large.

The Hot Chick
And what she said about her husband…I have blocked the exact words from my mind…but it made. me. CRINGE. (To be fair, I think she said something about his being a “quite a package”, and I guess that’s as bad as Biden referring to his wife as “drop dead gorgeous.” They are both personal opinions that should be kept personal.)
For her (and Guliani) to belittle Obama’s community organizing was really troubling for me. Shame on them. If not for people who work all over this country at the community level, millions of Americans would flounder. And I am not just talking about the people Republicans like to think of as “deadbeats” who don’t deserve help. Even my local library couldn’t run without the help of people in the community. You know why? Because the government doesn’t provide enough funding.
Her points on community service reminded me of Jon Stewart’s joke last week about how “everyone knows the Republicans love America. They just hate half the people living in it.” Republicans seem to constantly accuse the Democrats of being “elitist,” but I thought Palin’s speech included some of the most elitist, demeaning phrases I have ever heard.
What bothers me most about Palin’s candidacy is this: The Republicans have spent the last eight years scaring the CRAP out of us about terrorism. We need someone strong in the White House to protect us, etc. McCain is SEVENTY-TWO years old, and life-expectancies for men in our country average 78. What if something happened to him?? Oh, my god…if they get elected, I’m going out to the yard and digging a bunker.
At least Obama has been abroad, and many times. At least he (and Biden) have been experiencing and thinking about the world and our country’s role in it for years.
I liked McCain going in, I reallly did. I was always going to vote for Obama, but I did have respect for McCain the Senator and some of the things he was talking about doing in the beginning of the run. But now, I feel like the Republicans have taken over his campaign and are steering him toward this base that has gotten us where we are in the first place. In my opinion, he’s just coming off now like he’s this addled old man being led to the altar by the dark powers behind him.
Those same powers have run this country into the GROUND for their own capital gain. Have increased terrorism abroad with an ill-advised war for oil. Have sold our children’s futures with an out-of-control deficit, funded by other countries that our kids will have to pay.

Put that baby to bed where he belongs!
Ugh. The sight of her little DS baby being used to garner votes, made me sick last night. Who’s keeping a five-month-old up that late??? It’s like those people who take their kids to the R-rated 10:00 show because they don’t want to pay for a sitter. Sickening. I tossed and turned in bed all night, just sickened by the things I witnessed on television last night.
How can you claim to be the party of change, when your party is already in power? Doesn’t that point straight to the hypocracy that is the GOP?? How can you claim to be for family values when you shacked up with your current wife before you left your last one, as McCain did? Doesn’t that strike anyone as hypocritical?
I know that’s image and “culture war” that I am focusing on, but come on. Shouldn’t the Republicans use their convention to actually tell us their PLAN FOR THE COUNTRY’S FUTURE?? I don’t want to see attack dogs. I want to see THE PLAN that’s going to get our country out of this economic hole. Safely out of this war I was against from the beginning. I watched all of the Democratic speeches. Yeah, there was some mud-slinging, but they did present a plan. And that plan gave me hope. At least it gave me hope.
Tell you what — after Biden’s speech, at least I didn’t have thoughts of building a bunker in the yard.
Best Intentions
Posted: August 13, 2008 Filed under: family, Politics | Tags: free-lunch program, parks Leave a commentClooney says, “Do you know why Aberham Lincoln was the funniest president?” So I say, no, and he says, “Because he has ham in his name.”
The city I live in has this great program for the needy. In addition to giving free breakfasts and lunches in the schools, during the summer they give out breakfasts and lunches in the city parks. Trouble is, they only give them out in parks that are deemed safe by a certain set of standards. One of those parks is near my house, and we spend almost every day there. Of all the lunches the city distributes, perhaps six to ten a day actually go to the needy here. The needy, for various reasons, I am sure, don’t make it here. The meals are taken by the patrons of the park, which mostly draws from the surrounding area, and all of those people can afford to buy their own food by the SUV-load. After spending many days in the park, I estimate that 40% of the meals are going to neighborhood kids who don’t really need it, 20% are going to people who do, (those who are able to bus or drive to the location), and the rest are spoiling, sitting out in the hot summer sun with no ice or refrigeration.
I’m not saying the neighbors shouldn’t take the meals. Their tax dollars bought them, and they would certainly spoil anyway. You can’t leave milk or turkey sandwiches out for hours like that. It’s just another example of our tax dollars at work. It’s a wonderful idea to feed the needy, but why not distribute the food in an area where the needy can get to it easily?
Make it Offical!
Posted: May 4, 2008 Filed under: Politics | Tags: English language, immigration, protesters, spelling Leave a commentThis person was apparently protesting amnesty legislation for illegal immigrants in Texas. She might do well to learn the language herself.
Labyrinth
Posted: May 1, 2008 Filed under: Health, Politics | Tags: Health Care, Health Savings Account, MRI Leave a commentManfrengensen likes to run the numbers for our little organization. He takes pride (as he should) in keeping us fiscally sound.
A couple of years ago, he told me that he thought one of President Bush’s ideas made a lot of sense. So, I did the natural thing and sniffed his lapel for traces of opiates.
Manfrengensen figured out that it would be more economically sound for us to invest in a health savings account (HSA) like the ones President Bush was touting. In theory, HSA’s sound like a great idea. Consumers drive the medical economy by negotiating prices for their own health care. Sounds good, doesn’t it?
The way an HSA works, is that you buy insurance, at a lower cost, with a certain deductible amount that you pay out of pocket. Though you can pick whatever deductible you want in order to dial down your monthly premium, let’s pick a round number, — say, five or ten thousand dollars for the whole family. Then you put that money into a savings account that you dip into whenever you go to the doctor or hospital. You pay less in premiums every month, plus you earn interest on the money in your account.
Again, in theory, a good idea. In practice though, I imagine that most Americans couldn’t (or wouldn’t) be able to put the money aside for their health management. Most people can’t afford to put that kind of money in an account, and lots of those who do have the money, would probably rather spend it on more tangible goods like expensive cars, homes or shoes.
In addition, I don’t believe that the “consumer driven” economy of health will ever come to fruition. The idea is that if people have an economic stake in their own health maintenance, they will be not only be more discriminating about the ailments they seek care for, but they will be able to shop around and thus find the best prices for their care.
So far, I am finding the latter not to be the case at all.
In the last few years, I have suffered from migraines, and after several months of chronic attacks, I finally went to see a neurologist last summer. He’s great, said it seemed like the classic migraine scenario, but suggested that I get an MRI just to be sure. So, okay, I want to get an MRI. How much do they cost? You’d think it would be relatively easy to find out. But it’s not.
First I called the place doing the MRI. They couldn’t tell me. It would depend, the nice, patient lady said, on what my insurance company was willing to pay based on what kind of policy I had with them. She suggested I call the insurance company, as they would be the only ones capable of telling me that number. I said, “Can you give me a ballpark?” And she said, “Well, it could be anywhere from eight hundred to five thousand dollars.” That’s a big ballpark.
So, I called the insurance company, armed with the diagnosis codes the nice, patient lady gave me. The insurance company said they couldn’t give me that information, that the MRI place needed to call them. They said the price of the MRI depended on what price the doctor or the office had negotiated with the insurance company. So I called the MRI place back. The woman there was very nice and obliging. She called me back two minutes later and said that the insurance company told her that they “don’t give out that information.”

In other words, I was chasing my tail. I think it’s like flying to Florida. You never know what the price really is until the day you book your trip. Today the insurance company’s paying $800, but if you submit the bill tomorrow, they spin the wheel and the compensation could be something else entirely.
So, finally, I went to get the MRI, in total blindness, and I waited for the bill. It came in around two grand. Well spent, but again, not the consumer driven health care system we’re supposed to be talking about.
Manfrengensen needs to have his own thing done at some point, so he told me he was going to try to find out what it’s going to cost. I didn’t say anything, because he had to follow his own path, but yesterday he reported that he had gotten the same runaround that I had. Needless to say, I wasn’t at all surprised.
I’m not saying that HSA’s aren’t a good idea. Actually, I think ours is serving us well. But I do think that if you want demand to determine the price of health services, somebody needs to tell the suppliers that the rules of the game have changed.
What Up, Prozac Nation?
Posted: April 30, 2008 Filed under: Politics | Tags: Clinton, McCain, New York Times, renewable energy Leave a commentAfter I got the kids situated this morning, I sat down at the computer to read the New York Times. Man, that’s a bummer. I wasn’t in a good mood to begin with. The seeds of a headache germinated steadfastly in my frontal lobe.
The thing that caught my eye was an editorial piece by Thomas L. Friedman called “Dumb as We Wanna Be.” I have to agree with Friedman’s point about Hillary Clinton and John McCain wanting to suspend the federal excise tax on gasoline. It is short-sighted. If
anything, we should be making gasoline more expensive, encouraging people to drive less and find alternatives to their cars. We should be investing in mass transit and renewable energy, but instead, politicians are hindering the changes this country needs to make.
My favorite point in the Friedman article:
“Few Americans know it, but for almost a year now, Congress has been bickering over whether and how to renew the investment tax credit to stimulate investment in solar energy and the production tax credit to encourage investment in wind energy. The bickering has been so poisonous that when Congress passed the 2007 energy bill last December, it failed to extend any stimulus for wind and solar energy production. Oil and gas kept all their credits, but those for wind and solar have been left to expire this December. I am not making this up. At a time when we should be throwing everything into clean power innovation, we are squabbling over pennies.”
Read more here:
Right here, in my own state, the legislature recently put the kibosh on a plan to build a wind farm off the coast because it would be “too costly” to consumers. What they believe the price of oil and natural gas is going to be in the next few years, I have no idea, but I do think the myopia of politicians in this country is epidemic.
I think it’s very hard for most Americans to live ascetic lives when it comes to energy, but there are things that we could try to do like insulate our houses better, turn thermostats down in winter, up in summer, carpool, ride the bus when we can, etc . But I also think the government, both local and federal, should be doing more to help us, i.e. providing tax incentives for solar panels and hybrid cars, investing more in mass transit, and the like.
In practice though, there are few options. I’m about to start shopping for a new car. With three kids, all of whom still need booster/car seats, my options are limited if I want to go hybrid. What I don’t get is that Toyota actually makes a hybrid minivan, but they don’t sell it in the US. Why is that?
Price is always a factor too. If hybrids remain so much more expensive than fuel-only cars, how are the majority of drivers going to make the switch?
In other news, there’s an article about cases of child labor discovered this week in China:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/world/asia/01china.html?_r=1&hp&oref=login
Oh, and there was this little tidbit:
“Even factories that supply global companies, including Wal-Mart Stores, have been accused in recent years of using child labor, and violating local labor laws.”
Price, as I said, is always a factor. Everybody’s looking for the lowest prices. No one wants to pay more, regardless of what those extra pennies or dollars get them. I know people around here love their Wal-Mart. Sure their prices are super cheap, but no one cares why they’re so.
I guess I’m just having one of those days where I’m tending to look on the dark side.
But whatever…let’s just go back to talking about a crazy preacher who’s got nothing to do with anything real…
(Hang on until the end — it’s the funniest part.)
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=167140&title=penis-theft-panic-update
Why?
Posted: April 25, 2008 Filed under: Day-to-Day, family, Politics | Tags: Media, obama, Orwell, parenting, Politics Leave a comment
Ee has started asking “Why?” I love that phase. In this photo, I think she reminds me a bit of the amphibious character, Abe Sapien, from Hellboy. Those glasses are on upside down, by the way.
Wednesday, we went to lunch at a diner not far from our house because we had painters working in our kitchen. We were there for a few minutes when an older couple slid into the booth behind us. They must have been regulars, because when the waitress sidled up they exchanged friendly greetings, and the talk soon turned to the previous day’s primary in Pennsylvania.
Not that I was eavesdropping. I was sitting in our booth, trying to keep my monkeys in their seats.
But every so often, a snippet of their conversation reached my ears, and I was subsequently appalled. The old man said, “I don’t like that Obama…” and the kids had my attention for a second, “They say he’s…” T3, would you sit down and eat your grilled cheese? and then finally: “His name is just one letter off from Osama…” and I was like, huh?... “and those connections really scare me.”
Which connections was he talking about? Were they the ones Obama made at Columbia University or Harvard Law School? How about the ones he made while he was teaching at The University of Chicago Law School, or the connections he made serving in the U.S. Senate? Do those connections mean anything to this guy?
I’ll tell you what scares me: it’s how ignorant of the facts some people can be. How can people go through life so blindly? Again, I have to blame the media, specifically TV, since most people don’t even read any more. It is the TV news networks who are to blame for the sad state of American democracy. It is they who have perpetuated the disinformation and innuendo put forth by Obama’s opponents. It is they who continue to broadcast anything said by anyone without bothering to check for facts. And it’s a shame that some people in our country are too lazy or distracted by the day-to-day to find out the real facts about Barack Obama the Man or Barack Obama the Leader.
I’m not saying you have to vote for Obama, but I do think that if you decide not to vote for him, you should base that decision on the facts, not some slanderous allegation or sleezy “slip of the tongue” made by John Ashcroft, Mitt Romney, or Wolf Blitzer.
The moment has really stuck with me. Sometimes, I think I’m too cynical, but other times, I think, no, I’m right.
I know Orwell was right. He was just off by 20 years:
War Is Peace Freedom is Slavery Ignorance is Strength
It’s time for change.
Update on Banana Bread: Serious doorstop material. Yesterday T3 began to ask for a piece, and then thought the better of it, “Mom, can I please have a piece of ba– um, some other kind of snack?”
Don’t Believe The Hype
Posted: April 21, 2008 Filed under: Media, Politics, TV | Tags: Bush Administration, CNN, Iraq War, Media, military, New York Times, News Leave a commentYesterday’s New York Times ran an article about how the media has been using analysts with ties to military contractors to comment on the war for the last seven years. The result has been effective in skewing the media’s coverage of the War on Terror, and specifically the Iraq War in the administration’s favor.
This is why punditry is not news, and the American news corporations do a great disservice to the people by using pundits to fill their hours. If you really want news in the United States, the closest thing you can get is NPR or the BBC (which I think CNN should look to as its model instead of FOX.)
Some highlights from the Times (underlining and bold is my emphasis):
“Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.
“The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air.
“Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to the viewers, and sometimes not even to the networks themselves. But collectively, the men on the plane and several dozen other military analysts represent more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants. The companies include defense heavyweights, but also scores of smaller companies, all part of a vast assemblage of contractors scrambling for hundreds of billions in military business generated by the administration’s war on terror. It is a furious competition, one in which inside information and easy access to senior officials are highly prized.
“Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.”
You can read the whole article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?ref=arts
Keep your vomit bag handy.
You can’t see me now, but I have to tell you that reading this article really affected my nerves. I can feel outrage running through my veins, and I sincerely hope you do too. It’s saddens me that more people in this country want to talk about last night’s results of American Idol than they do what’s going on with the war.
If you ask me, not that anyone will, this entire administration should go straight from office to Attica.




